Friday, 30 September 2011

Arsene Wenger's Arsenal destiny in own hands - Stan Kroenke

Arsenal manager Arsene Wenger is the only man who will decide when he leaves the job, says Gunners owner Stan Kroenke.
"It's his decision and only he will know that," Kroenke said in an interview with the Daily Telegraph.
Wenger has been criticised for his transfer policy and the Gunners' poor start to the Premier League season.
But the American businessman added: "Arsene's our man. As an owner, that's who we put our confidence in."
And he pointed to 61-year-old Wenger's record in discovering new talent, and to the promise of a side containing youngsters like Alex Oxlade-Chamberlain and Jack Wilshere.
"Maybe it is one of those times when we have to work our way through, maybe with some young players," Kroenke said.

Sunderland manager Steve Bruce disappointed by Titus Bramble's conduct

Sunderland manager Steve Bruce disappointed by Titus Bramble's conduct
Sunderland boss Steve Bruce believes footballers should show more responsibility off the pitch.
Bruce was speaking in the week the club suspended defender Titus Bramble while police investigate allegations of sexual assault and possession of a Class A drug.
Legal restrictions limited what Bruce could talk about.
But he said: "In Titus's case there is an investigation - but I don't think he should be in that position anyway."
Bramble, 30, was questioned a day after Sunderland's 2-1 defeat at Norwich and will miss Saturday's home game against West Brom.
And Bruce added: "I don't think you should be in a nightclub on a Tuesday night. I don't think any footballer should be in a nightclub on a Monday night, Tuesday night or Wednesday night - not with a game on a Saturday, especially after the way you have just been beaten on the Monday night.
"In my day, the vast majority of people I played with would have put their head down, gone into the bunker and said, 'Well, I am going to go and train hard and put it right on Saturday'.
Unfortunately, with the rewards they get, they alienate themselves and should show more responsibility."

Tevez will not apologise to Manchester City manager Mancini

Carlos Tevez maintains he has nothing to apologise to Roberto Mancini about and believes his team-mates will support his version of events.
Manager Mancini said Tevez refused to come on against Bayern Munich and will not feature for Manchester City again.
The striker blamed "confusion on the bench", adding he was "ready to play".
Mancini chose not to comment on the matter on Friday but received strong backing from Manchester United counterpart Sir Alex Ferguson.
Tevez believes the players who were alongside him on the bench on Tuesday will back his story, despite telling Sky Sports later that evening: "I didn't feel right to play, so I didn't."
James Milner, Aleksandar Kolarov, Edin Dzeko and Pablo Zabaleta were on the bench when the confrontation took place.
Tevez, 27, has been suspended for two weeks by the club pending an investigation into the incident, which happened in the second half of the 2-0 Champions League defeat by Bayern.
Mancini appeared at his usual Friday news conference, but beforehand journalists were warned not to ask questions about Tevez.
The Italian manager denied this had been the hardest week of his managerial career.
"No, no, absolutely no," he said. "Why is it difficult? Some situations can happen in football, in your job. It's important that the past is finished.
"I don't have any complications. Only one complication that we had two days ago is that we lost against Bayern Munich, only this. We started very well. We can do a fantastic season, I don't have this problem.
"It is normal that one player is not happy to leave the pitch in an important game or to stay on the bench, it's a normal situation for every manager."
Ferguson endorsed Mancini's handling of the affair at his Friday news conference.
"Roberto has shown his strength of character, his strength of management and that is important," said Ferguson.
Tevez was widely criticised for his actions during his side's defeat in Munich, though he maintains that he did not refuse to play, insisting that his failure to take to the pitch was a "misunderstanding".

West Ham want Carlos Tevez on loan from Manchester City

West Ham want Carlos Tevez on loan from Manchester City
West Ham are interested in bringing Manchester City forward Carlos Tevez back to Upton Park.
Football League rules allow him to sign for a Championship club on loan, even though the transfer window has closed.
City manager Roberto Mancini said the 27-year-old refused to come on against Bayern Munich on Tuesday and will not feature for the Manchester club again.
Tevez insists he has nothing to apologise for and believes his team-mates will back his version of events.
West Ham want Carlos Tevez on loan from Manchester City

Late on Thursday, a senior official at another of the Argentine's former clubs, Corinthians, told BBC Sport that the Brazilian side were "at the moment not thinking about" a loan move for the player.
In July, Tevez came close to joining Corinthians before they pulled out of the move.
City thought a £40m deal had been agreed after the striker told the Premier League outfit he wanted to return to South America, but he remained at Etihad Stadium.
Tevez became a fans' favourite in his previous spell at Upton Park as he helped save the Hammers from relegation in 2006-07 before leaving for Manchester United.
But his stay was also marked by controversy.
In April 2007, West Ham were found guilty by a Premier League tribunal of acting improperly and withholding vital documentation over the ownership of Tevez and compatriot Javier Mascherano when they signed the duo in 2006.
Earlier on Friday, West Ham completed a deal for Arsenal goalkeeper Manuel Almunia on a one-month emergency loan after Robert Green was ruled out for around six weeks.
Thursday, 29 September 2011

Leci: Love Thy Neighbour


Leci: Love Thy Neighbour

It's interesting to note that two of the nominees came from the same fixture.In November 2010, Tottenham went to the Emirates Stadium and came away with all 3 points on Arsenal soil for the first time in 17 years.In April, the two sides met at White Hart Lane, and served up a frenzied feast of frantic feisty football, the game ending in a 3-3 draw.There were plenty of candidates for the ‘Game of the Season' in the 2010-11 edition of the Barclays Premier League.They were two remarkable matches, made all the more extraordinary by the fact that Arsenal were 2 goals to the good in both of them, and were ultimately pegged back.More often than not in the Premier League era, Tottenham have resembled lambs to the slaughter in meetings with their North London neighbours. Last season appeared to witness a change in the tectonic foundations of one of the bitterest and most long standing rivalries in English football.It all started in 1913, and got particularly fractious in 1919, when Tottenham were convinced that Arsenal had taken their place in the old First Division by nefarious means - it's a long story.The fact that Arsenal started life as a football club in South London and then moved to become Tottenham's closest neighbours exacerbated the situation (too close for comfort, clearly).In the early days, such was the extent of the acrimony, that matches often descended into the kind of near-violence that would have produced a rash of red cards today.In the Premier League era though, it's fair to say that Arsenal have had Spurs' number - even introducing a ‘St Totteringham's Day' - the point in the season at which Tottenham, mathematically, couldn't possibly finish above Arsenal in the league. This was indicative of the confidence level in the Arsenal camp, that they would better, and continue to exceed, their rivals' achievements.As I mentioned earlier though, the situation has changed of late, and perhaps for the first time in many a season, Tottenham will go into Sunday's North London derby as marginal favourites.Statistically, you could say that Arsene Wenger's side squandered 5 points over the two encounters from eminently winnable positions, and while defeat at The Emirates must have been galling for the Gunners (especially bearing in mind the fact that they were comfortably in front at the break and cruising) the 2 points dropped at The Lane proved to be even more significant. They effectively put paid to any hopes Arsenal had of challenging for the title.
Arsenal's problematic start to this campaign has been well documented, as they continue to come to terms with the departure of their two best players Cesc Fabregas and Samir Nasri. It reflects the fact that Arsenal have become what is termed a ‘selling club', with top players electing to pursue honours elsewhere - presumably on the basis that they don't expect The Emirates' trophy cabinet to be replenished any time soon.
There is no doubt that Arsenal, as a team, has been a joy to watch, and plays the kind of football that delights purists, even throughout the course of the last 6 unsuccessful (in terms of picking up silverware) seasons.
Significantly though, after personnel issues were sorted out, Spurs have kicked on well, and can cite two decent away maximums in a recent 3-game winning streak that also includes a 4-0 thumping of Liverpool.The context for this Sunday's North London derby could hardly be more fascinating, despite the fact that we're not even 1/6 of the way into the season.
With new players beginning to bed in though, there are encouraging signs for the Gunners, especially after last weekend's comfortable win against Bolton. Tottenham for their part, endured a difficult start to the season, suffering heavy defeats against the two Manchester clubs, while the Luka Modric saga took twists, turns and its toll on the club.
It's a fixture that always captures the imagination, and invariably provides plenty of goals and excitement. Passions will be at fever pitch (allusion intended) for the partisans this weekend, while the neutrals will be able to sit back, relax, and enjoy one of the most compelling fixtures the Barclays Premier League has to offer.

Suggs, Ravens would love nothing better than to shut up Rex Ryan

Suggs, Ravens would love nothing better than to shut up Rex Ryan
As brash and bold as ever, Rex Ryan can talk the talk with any NFL head coach who has ever donned the headset. But Baltimore outside linebacker Terrell Suggs takes a back seat to no one in terms of self-confidence, self-expression and big-game buildup. And that's just one of the many reasons Sunday night's reunion-themed matchup between the Jets and Ravens makes for the NFL's centerpiece showdown of Week 4.
On one sideline will be Ryan, the Jets' proud and loud third-year head coach, who'll be making his first trip to Baltimore in the regular season since spending 10 mostly successful years there as a Ravens defensive assistant (1999-2008). On the other side will be Suggs, fellow Baltimore linebacker Ray Lewis, safety Ed Reed and all the other defensive Ravens who once took their marching orders from the man who is now New York's round mound of sound.
"We loved him when he was here,'' Suggs said Wednesday, in a lunch-hour phone interview. "Him and [current Jets defensive coordinator and ex-Ravens outside linebackers coach] Mike Pettine are responsible for a lot of guys here and what they've done in their careers, mine included. I love playing against Rex, because I think he gets to see his finest work up close. If he's Michelangelo, I was his Sistine Chapel. He gets to see what he created. He gets to coach against the very beast, the monster, he helped create.''
I love a good Sistine Chapel reference dropped seamlessly into a football story as much as the next guy, so at that point I just tried to keep Suggs rolling, asking if he and his teammates ever let themselves wonder what might have been had Baltimore elevated Ryan from defensive coordinator to head coach rather than hire John Harbaugh in early 2008?
"The first year we did, when he was still here (as Harbaugh's defensive coordinator),'' Suggs admitted. "We thought about it, what if Rex was the coach? But he's not, so we got over it pretty quick. But yeah, we all knew he was going to be a great head coach. You can see how his guys love him, and how guys are always trying to line up to play for him.
"We feel as though he left prematurely. But he had to do what was best for him and his family. He always wanted to be a head coach, but we felt he left while there was still work to be done. He left the job undone, and that was winning a Super Bowl. And now he's trying to do it with somebody else, and we're taking kind of offense to that.''
The Jets and Ravens (both 2-1) have every right to sprinkle Super Bowl references into their pregame hype. After all, New York has made the past two AFC title games since Ryan arrived, and Harbaugh has led Baltimore to the playoffs in all three of his seasons with the Ravens, with New York and Baltimore each producing a league-best four postseason road victories over that span. The goal this year in both cities is clear-cut: Beating out the behemoths from New England and Pittsburgh, respectively, and finally forego the wild-card route in the playoffs in favor of division titles and higher seeds in the AFC postseason field.
The Ravens already have taken a step toward that reality, embarrassing Pittsburgh 35-7 in their regular-season opener in Baltimore. The Jets, who are in the middle leg of a demanding three-game road trip, get their first shot at the Patriots next week in Foxboro. But first, the Ravens must be confronted, and Ryan would dearly love to pay them back for beating his Jets 10-9 in last year's season opener, a game that saw New York gallingly fail to score a touchdown and amass just 176 yards of offense in its regular-season debut at the New Meadowlands Stadium.
"It'll be a physical game again,'' said Suggs, the pass-rushing star and ninth-year veteran who played the first six seasons of his NFL career on a defense that Ryan helped coach. "But we've got the advantage that we're at M&T [Bank Stadium]. So it's going to be a fight.''
The Ravens enter the fight with a sense of momentum generated by last Sunday's impressive 37-7 dismantling of the Rams in St. Louis, giving them victories by 28 and 30 points in the season's first three weeks. Baltimore is suddenly an offensive power, rolling up a franchise-best 553 yards of offense against the Rams, with quarterback Joe Flacco throwing for a career-high 389 yards, including three eye-popping first-quarter touchdowns to rookie receiver Torrey Smith (who made his first five NFL receptions for 152 yards and those three scores).
The Jets, by comparison, are reeling in the wake of Week's 3 results. First they got rolled in Oakland by a resurgent Raiders team that ran for 234 yards and four touchdowns in its 34-24 win -- the most rushing yards by far that Ryan's Jets have allowed in his 41-game New York tenure -- and then they got filleted in the media by Jets legend Joe Namath, who suggested that Ryan's penchant for singing the praises of his own players has left them overconfident and under-prepared.
That's a subjective case to make, but New York left itself open to criticism of some sort after the debacle against the Raiders. The Jets run defense, one of the supposed strengths of the team, is ranked 31st overall (136.7-yard average), and has allowed an NFL-worst five rushing touchdowns. New York's own identity as a run-first team out of the "Ground and Pound'' mold seemed laughable, given Oakland out-rushed New York by 134 yards.
Ryan likely isn't stroking his players all that much this week, but Suggs both saw and benefited from Ryan's tendency to build up his guys' self-esteem. But at the same time, he said without Ryan's demanding style and sense of discipline he would not have developed into the Pro Bowl level-linebacker he has been for most of his career.
"He's a player's coach, no doubt,'' Suggs said. "He'll stick his neck out for you, and he's going to put you in the best position to win. I'm going to be totally honest with you. When I first got to Baltimore [in 2003], he was my coach, and all I wanted to do was just sack quarterbacks. I didn't want to do none of the physical stuff, and he told me that's not an option here. If you're going to play on this Ravens defense and wear a Ravens decal, you're going to be one tough SOB, and he turned me into one. Like I said, I credit the man a lot for my career, him and Mike Pettine. He helped me learn how to be a pro. He taught me about responsibility and how to be a guy to not let the defense down.''
Suggs is off to one of the most dominant, playmaking starts of his career, with four sacks, two forced fumbles and an interception in Baltimore's three games. And this is the kind of spotlight game he loves to take center stage in. Besides Ryan, his spotlight-loving former coach, Suggs will be competing against three ex-Ravens-turned-Jets: linebacker Bart Scott, receiver Derrick Mason and safety Jim Leonhard. But he knows where the story this week starts, and it's on Ryan's return.
"Oh, definitely Rex loves this,'' Suggs said of the pre-game focus on Ryan. "He demands a certain kind of presence, a certain kind of attention, and what better city to do it in than New York? It wasn't a surprise to me how he's been with the Jets. I knew once he got his opportunity he was going to explode with it, and that's what he did.''
As long as Ryan and Suggs are involved, you know the talk won't even end with the game's final whistle. One team's going to be 3-1, the other 2-2, but both will have something to say about it. That's a given.
"When we beat the Jets, I'm going to give Rex a hug and a kiss,'' Suggs said. "And then I'm going to kiss Bart [Scott], and hug Bart. And then I'm going to Disney World, because it's our bye week.''

Brady seeking revenge ... nine years later


Brady seeking revenge ... nine years later

Brady seeking revenge ... nine years later
Tom Brady's memory is in fine shape. [Brady] hates losing so much that he remembers what it felt like the last time he played a football game in the Bay Area -- and that was almost nine years ago. "The last time we played in Oakland it wasn't a pleasant flight home," Brady said. "Hopefully, we can redeem ourselves this time around." The Raiders, still stinging from a loss in the "Tuck Rule" game in the playoffs the previous season, beat the Patriots 27-20 in November 2002 at the Coliseum en route to an eventual AFC title. Through a quirk of scheduling, and the fact Brady was out for the season after knee surgery when thePatriots visited the 49ers and Raiders in 2008, he hasn't played anywhere near his hometown of San Mateo since

Updates Via E-Mail